We had to do similar things in keystone in order to validate uuid-ish types (just not as fancy) [0] [1]. If we didn't have to worry about being backwards compatible with non-uuid formats, it would be awesome to have one implementation for checking that.
[0] https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/6c6589d2b0f308cb788b37b29ebde515304ee41e/keystone/identity/schema.py#L69 [1] https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/6c6589d2b0f308cb788b37b29ebde515304ee41e/keystone/common/validation/parameter_types.py#L38-L45 On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Matt Riedemann <mriede...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/24/2017 12:58 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > >> >> Which uses is_uuid_like to do the validation - >> https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/1106477b78c80743e6443 >> abc30911b24a9ab7b15/nova/api/validation/validators.py#L85-L87 >> >> We assumed (as did many others) that is_uuid_like was strict enough for >> param validation. It is apparently not. >> >> Either it needs to be fixed to be so, or some other function needs to be >> created that is, that people can cut over to. >> >> -Sean >> >> > Well kiss my grits. I had always assumed that was built into jsonschema. > > -- > > Thanks, > > Matt > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
