>I think there's something else you should take under consideration. >Oslo messaging is not just an OpenStack library. It's the RPC library >that all projects are relying on and one of the strong goals we have >in OpenStack is to reduce code and efforts duplications. We'd love to >have more people testing and contributing to oslo.messaging in order >to make it as battle tested as celery is. > >Please, don't get me wrong. I don't mean to say you didn't considered >it, I just want to add another reason why we should always try to >re-use the libraries that other projects are using - unless there's a >strong technical reason ;).
As I¹ve said, we are willing to look at the library for Icehouse. As lots of projects have implemented it, I hope that the switchover will be reasonably easy. I think this conversation has gotten away from our incubation request and into an argument about what makes a good library and when and how projects should choose between oslo and other options. I¹m happy to have the second one in another thread, but that seems like a longer conversation that is separate from our request. It seems like the comments are slowing down now. Does everyone feel our list (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Barbican/Incubation) accurately captures the comments that have been brought up? I filled out the Scope section of our request and I think we¹ve cleared up the PTL election issue. Is there anything else I missed or have we covered most of the issues? Jarret _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev