On Dec 3, 2013 6:45 PM, "Jarret Raim" <jarret.r...@rackspace.com> wrote: > > > >With the introduction of programs (think: official teams), all > >incubated/integrated projects must belong to an official program... So > >when a project applies for incubation but is not part of an official > >program yet, it de-facto also applies to be considered a program. > > Ahh, understood. So I guess we'd be asking for a new program then.
While I am all for adding a new program, I think we should only add one if we rule out all existing programs as a home. With that in mind why not add this to the keystone program? Perhaps that may require a tweak to keystones mission statement, but that is doable. I saw a partial answer to this somewhere but not a full one. > > >I'm not 100% sure we'll keep that "election" requirement. I think the > >program application should have an initial PTL named on it. The way > >that's determined is up to the team (natural candidate, election...). > > It sounds like if we have a PTL election as part of the normal Icehouse > schedule, we should be covered here? > > >No, since the team produces code the ATC designation method is pretty > >well established. This rule cares for programs which have weirder > >deliverables. > > Easy enough, thanks for the clarification. > > > > Jarret > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev