On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Alex Schultz <[email protected]> wrote: > configuration and usability issues. But those aren't exciting so > people don't want to work on them...
[Not picking on Alex here, but I've seen this repeated again in this thread like every other one] s/people/corporate project managers/ Yes, there are individual preferences involved here, but those of us who are in a position to CHOOSE which projects we invest in are actually in the minority, and shrinking. The choices of what contributing companies invest in are largely determined by their customers, or where they feel their business needs to go. Infrastructure, SDKs, documentation, none of these are on any of the public roadmaps that I have seen (I have not seen them all so speak up where I am wrong here). Those who are customers of these sponsor/contributor companies also need to be bugging them for these things too, and not just "enterprise ready" or "telco ready" or "GPU ready" or whatever their particular shiny thing is this year. Make long term releases important on corporate bottom lines and it WILL become a thing. dt -- Dean Troyer [email protected] Tragedy. Commons. Rinse. Repeat. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
