Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
> On 16 May 2017 at 06:20, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I'd prefer for these builds to have a daily cadence because it sets the
>> expectations w.r.t maintenance right: "These images are daily builds and not
>> certified releases. For stable builds you're better off building it
>> yourself"
> And daily builds are exactly what I wanted in the first place:) We
> probably will keep publishing release packages too, but we can be so
> called 3rd party. I also agree [4] is completely unrealistic and I
> would be against putting such heavy burden of responsibility on any
> community, including Kolla.
> While daily cadence will send message that it's not stable, truth will
> be that it will be more stable than what people would normally build
> locally (again, it passes more gates), but I'm totally fine in not
> saying that and let people decide how they want to use it.
> So, can we move on with implementation?

I'm just listing options to help frame the discussion. I still think we
need a global answer on this (for container images and VMs) so I think
it would be great to have a clear TC resolution (picking one of those
options) before moving on with implementation.

Thierry Carrez (ttx)

OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Reply via email to