On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:40 AM, gordon chung <[email protected]> wrote: > > > i just want to add, i am ok to meet at PTG but if we consider the turn > out at forum sessions, we aren't getting any more developers, just > random requirement requests. > > we can discuss on irc and mailing list? in fact we encourage it, which > is why you might see random short emails from me on list about whether i > should proceed on work item a certain way. i understand how meetings and > presence create this false narrative that work is being done. > regardless, i do hope we leverage ML and irc more. if you have a comment > or question, don't be afraid to use this medium. i shouldn't have to > wait 6 months to here problems :) > > cheers, > > Hi gordc,
I agree on it that there may be not that much developers in the session, So I'm ok if there isn't one at PTG. I'm sorry because I know this is not an appropriate place to talk about weekly meeting in IRC. But you know the traditional way is not necessarily burdensome, I‘m sure ML is a good way, as well as IRC, to communicate in free time. Can we restore weekly meeting or discuss in some centralized way just like other TC projects so that some developers can get timely responses and brainstorm for Telemetry? lhx_ __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe <http://[email protected]/?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
