> Thanks for answering the base question. So, if AZs are implemented with > haggs, then really, they are truly disjoint from cells (ie, not a subset > of a cell and not a superset of a cell, just unrelated.) Does that > philosophy agree with what you are stating?
Correct, aggregates are at the top level, and they can span cells if you so desire (or not if you don't configure any that do). The aggregate stuff doesn't know anything about cells, it only knows about hosts, so it's really independent. --Dan __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
