On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 03:45:52PM +0000, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-05-31 15:22:59 +0000 (+0000), Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2017-05-31 09:43:11 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: > > [...] > > > it's news to me that they're considering reversing course. If the > > > QA team isn't going to continue, we'll need to figure out what > > > that means and potentially find another group to do it. > > > > I wasn't there for the discussion, but it sounds likely to be a > > mischaracterization. I'm going to assume it's not true (or much more > > nuanced) at least until someone responds on behalf of the QA team. > > This particular subthread is only going to go further into the weeds > > until it is grounded in some authoritative details. > > Apologies for replying to myself, but per discussion[*] with Chris > in #openstack-dev I'm adjusting the subject header to make it more > clear which particular line of speculation I consider weedy. > > Also in that brief discussion, Graham made it slightly clearer that > he was talking about pushback on the tempest repo getting tests for > new trademark programs beyond "OpenStack Powered Platform," > "OpenStack Powered Compute" and "OpenStack Powered Object Storage."
TBH, it's a bit premature to have the discussion. These additional programs do not exist yet, and there is a governance road block around this. Right now the set of projects that can be used defcore/interopWG is limited to the set of projects in: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/tags/tc_approved-release.html We had a forum session on it (I can't find the etherpad for the session) which was pretty speculative because it was about planning the new programs. Part of that discussion was around the feasibility of using tests in plugins and whether that would be desirable. Personally, I was in favor of doing that for some of the proposed programs because of the way they were organized it was a good fit. This is because the proposed new programs were extra additions on top of the base existing interop program. But it was hardly a definitive discussion. We will have to have discussions about how we're going to actually implement the additional programs when we start to create them, but that's not happening yet. -Matt Treinish
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
