I recalled that UC is inviting WG chairs to join the UC IRC meeting to share/provide WG updates on high level status/activities? Is this something similar? Should the WG chair attend the UC meeting instead of setting up another separate meeting?
On Wednesday, May 31, 2017, MCCABE, JAMEY A <jm6...@att.com> wrote: > Working group (WG) chairs or delegates, please enter your name (and WG > name) and what times you could meet at this poll: > https://beta.doodle.com/poll/6k36zgre9ttciwqz#table > > > > As back ground and to share progress: > > - We started and generally confirmed the desire to have a regular > cross WG status meeting at the Boston Summit. > - Specifically the groups interested in Telco NFV and Fog Edge agreed > to collaborate more often and in a more organized fashion. > - In e-mails and then in today’s Operators Telco/NFV we finalized a > proposal to have all WGs meet for high level status monthly and to bring > the collaboration back to our individual WG sessions. > - the User Committee sessions are appropriate for the Monthly WG > Status meeting > - more detailed coordination across Telco/NFV and Fog Edge groups > should take place in the Operators Telco NFV WG meetings which already > occur every 2 weeks. > - we need participation of each WG Chair (or a delegate) > - we welcome and request the OPNFV and Linux Foundation and other WGs > to join us in the cross WG status meetings > > > > The Doodle was setup to gain concurrence for a time of week in which we > could schedule and is not intended to be for a specific week. > > > > Jamey McCabe – AT&T Integrated Cloud -jm6819 - mobile if needed > 847-496-1176 > > > > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
