Hi! Back on regular schedule, here is an update on the status of a number of TC-proposed governance changes, in an attempt to rely less on a weekly meeting to convey that information.
You can find the full status list of open topics at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee == Recently-approved changes == * Follow-up precisions on office hours [1] * New git repositories: fuxi-golang * Updated links to Vitrage developer documentation * Pike goal responses for freezer, cloudkitty [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/470926/ == Open discussions == A new draft was produced for the TC vision, taking into account some of the feedback we received on the initial draft. Please review: * Begin integrating vision feedback and editing for style [1] [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/473620/ A new, hopefully more consensual revision of the database support resolution was posted by Dirk. Please review it at: * Declare plainly the current state of PostgreSQL in OpenStack [2] [2] https://review.openstack.org/427880 A new item was proposed for addition on our top-5 wanted list: Glance contributors. Please review and comment at: * Add "Glance Contributors" to top-5 wanted list [3] [3] https://review.openstack.org/474604 We did not have that many comments on John Garbutt's revised resolution on ensuring that decisions are globally inclusive. Please see: * Decisions should be globally inclusive [4] [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/460946/ The discussion on Queens goals is a bit stalled, as Gerrit is not the ideal tool to select x picks out of n proposals. I think a dedicated IRC meeting could help us sort through the proposals and propose a set (see below). In the mean time, please review: * Discovery alignment, with two options: [5] [6] * Policy and docs in code [7] * Migrate off paste [8] * Continuing Python 3.5+ Support [9] [5] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468436/ [6] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468437/ [7] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/469954/ [8] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-May/117747.html [9] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-May/117746.html A proposal to remove "meritocracy" from the Four opens details was posted by cdent. Please review at: * Remove "meritocracy" from the opens [10] [10] https://review.openstack.org/473510 Finally, a number of tag additions are still being discussed, so you might want to give your opinion on them: * assert:supports-rolling-upgrade for keystone [11] * assert:supports-upgrade to Barbican [12] * stable:follows-policy for Kolla [13] [11] https://review.openstack.org/471427 [12] https://review.openstack.org/472547 [13] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/346455/ == Voting in progress == The Top 5 help wanted list (and the "doc owners" initial item) almost have the votes necessary to merge. Please vote at: * Introduce Top 5 help wanted list [14] * Add "Doc owners" to top-5 wanted list [15] [14] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/466684/ [15] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/469115/ The new "assert:supports-api-interoperability" tag also seems to have broad support and be ready for merging. Please vote at: * Introduce assert:supports-api-interoperability [16] [16] https://review.openstack.org/418010 Finally, Doug's guidelines for managing releases of binary artifacts is also missing a couple of votes to be approved: * Guidelines for managing releases of binary artifacts [17] [17] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/469265/ == TC member actions for the coming week(s) == johnthetubaguy to finalize updating "Describe what upstream support means" with a new revision [https://review.openstack.org/440601] flaper87 to update "Drop Technical Committee meetings" with a new revision [https://review.openstack.org/459848] Additionally, we are still looking for a volunteer TC member sponsor/mentor to helm the Gluon team navigate the OpenStack seas as they engage to become an official project. Any volunteer ? == Need for a TC meeting next Tuesday == In order to make progress on the Pike goal selection, I think a dedicated IRC meeting will be necessary. We have a set of valid goals proposed already: we need to decide how many we should have, and which ones. Gerrit is not great to have that ranking discussion, so I think we should meet to come up with a set, and propose it on the mailing-list for discussion. We could use the regular meeting slot on Tuesday, 20:00utc. How does that sound ? -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev