On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Chris Dent <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Flavio Percoco wrote: > >> So, should we let teams to host IRC meetings in their own channels? > > > Yes.
++ >> Thoughts? > > > I think the silo-ing concern is, at least recently, not relevant on > two fronts: IRC was never a good fix for that and silos gonna be > silos. > > There are so many meetings and so many projects there already are > silos and by encouraging people to use the mailing lists more we are > more effectively enabling diverse access than IRC ever could, > especially if the IRC-based solution is the impossible "always be on > IRC, always use a bouncer, always read all the backlogs, always read > all the meeting logs". > > The effective way for a team not to be a silo is for it to be > better about publishing accessible summaries of itself (as in: make > more email) and participating in cross project related reviews. If > it doesn't do that, that's the team's loss. > > Synchronous communication is fine for small groups of speakers but > that's pretty much where it ends. +1000 with what cdent said. > -- > Chris Dent ┬──┬◡ﾉ(° -°ﾉ) https://anticdent.org/ > freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Emilien Macchi __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
