Hi Paul-André, This was without ceilometer. Nova + Neutron were consuming a lot of connections. Some charts are available in the Barcelona presentation[1] and the performance docs[2]. In the latter you'll find some telemetry related tests.
[1]: https://www.openstack.org/assets/presentation-media/Chasing-1000-nodes-scale.pdf [2]: https://docs.openstack.org/developer/performance-docs/ Best, Matt ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Paul-Andre Raymond" <paul-andre.raym...@nexius.com> > À: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Envoyé: Vendredi 30 Juin 2017 18:42:04 > Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal > for message bus analysis > > Hi Matthieu, > > You mentioned 15000 connections with 1000 compute nodes. > Was that mostly Nova? Was ceilometer involved? > I would be curious to know how much AMQP traffic is Control related > (e.g. spinning up VMs) vs how much is telemetry related in a typical > openstack deployment. > Do we know that? > > I have also left some comments in the doc. > > Paul-Andre > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthieu Simonin <matthieu.simo...@inria.fr> > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 6:54 PM > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman > proposal for message bus analysis > > Hi Ken, > > Thanks for starting this ! > I've made a first pass on the epad and left some notes and questions > there. > > Best, > > Matthieu > ----- Mail original ----- > > De: "Ken Giusti" <kgiu...@gmail.com> > > À: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Envoyé: Mercredi 21 Juin 2017 15:23:26 > > Objet: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman > > proposal for message bus analysis > > > > Hi All, > > > > Andy and I have taken a stab at defining some test scenarios for > > anal the > > different message bus technologies: > > > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/1BGhFHDIoi > > > > We've started with tests for just the oslo.messaging layer to > > analyze > > throughput and latency as the number of message bus clients - and > > the bus > > itself - scale out. > > > > The next step will be to define messaging oriented test scenarios > > for an > > openstack deployment. We've started by enumerating a few of the > > tools, > > topologies, and fault conditions that need to be covered. > > > > Let's use this epad as a starting point for analyzing messaging - > > please > > feel free to contribute, question, and criticize :) > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > -- > > Ken Giusti (kgiu...@gmail.com) > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: > > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
