On 27 June 2017 at 23:47, Sean Dague <[email protected]> wrote: > I still think I've missed, or not grasped, during this thread how a SIG > functions differently than a WG, besides name. Both in theory and practice.
I think for the most part SIG is just a more fitting moniker for some of these groups. E.g. I would say the scientific-wg is really a SIG, typically with a few loose sub-WGs at any time, but the bulk of the active membership is largely people doing similar jobs and deploying/using OpenStack for similar things across science/academia - so we basically have a lot of "shop" to talk about, and sometimes that is only peripherally related to OpenStack. -- Cheers, ~Blairo __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
