On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Alex Schultz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey folks, > > Since Fuel has been recently moved to a hosted project and there is > very little activity anymore, I am proposing (with much sadness) that > we remove the Fuel CI jobs from Puppet CI. This is being brought up > because we have a change in puppet-swift that is going to break the > fuel jobs and without any movement on the proposed fix[1] for it in > Fuel, it would seem that we'll end up just breaking Fuel without > anyone to fix it. I'd love to keep it around because it adds > additional coverage for us but since it seems to no longer being kept > current, I'd rather not block future patches due to broken Fuel CI. > Let me know if there are any objections or happy alternatives. If > there's no response I'll work on the removal next week (~July 13, > 2017).
Sad to loose coverage but I think tripleo coverage is not too bad on this side. My only concern is if we keep breaking Fuel for all the changes we do in Puppet OpenStack modules - we need Fuel folks to acknowledge the fact it's going to happen for sure and quite often without the CI jobs. > Thanks, > -Alex > > [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445998/ > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/475043/ > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Emilien Macchi __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
