On 6 December 2013 08:32, Matt Wagner <matt.wag...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue Dec 3 06:53:04 2013, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
> I think it would be very fair to say that's just something we're not > focusing on at this point, and that to start out we're just going to > handle the simple case of wanting to install many nodes, each with only > one distinct type. But I just wanted to clarify that we are, indeed, > making that decision? TripleO /can/ be used to deploy a single node cloud, but outside of testing our templates thats really not interesting: a single node cloud with a separate undercloud is going to be an exceedingly rare deployment: 100% overhead from the deployment infrastructure is not going to sit well with low-budget environments. Not that TripleO needs a big budget, just that thats a corollary: if you're installing one machine, you aren't really in a position to use rolling upgrades, to have a separate entire machine managing your deployment, and dedicate a LAN to your cloud. -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
