Hi all, Long time ago it was discussed to make the keystone HEAD responses right [1] as the RFC [2][3] recommends:
" A response to the HEAD method is identical to what an equivalent request made with a GET would have been, except it lacks a body. " So, the status code needs to be identical as well ! Recently turned out, keystone is still not correct in all cases [4]. 'Get role inference rule' (GET), 'Confirm role inference rule' (HEAD) has the same URL pattern, but they differs in the status code (200/204) which is not allowed! [5] This is the only documented case where both the HEAD and GET defined and the HEAD has a 204 response. Are you going to fix this [4] as it was fixed before [6] ? Best Regards, Attila PS.: Here is the tempest change for accepting the right code [7]. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-July/039140.html [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-4.3.2 [3] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7234#section-4.3.5 [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1701541 [5] https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/identity/v3/?expanded=confirm-role-inference-rule-detail,get-role-inference-rule-detail [6] https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1334368 [7] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/479286/
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
