On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Monty Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07/10/2017 01:21 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > >> On Jul 10, 2017, at 5:06 AM, Mikhail Fedosin <[email protected] <mailto: >> [email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Given all the advantages and features of Glare, I believe that it can >>> become the successful drop-in replacement. >>> >> >> Can you clarify this? Let’s assume I have a decent-sized deployment >> running Glance. If I were to remove Glance and replace it with Glare, are >> you saying that nothing would break? Operators, users, scripts, SDKs, etc., >> would all work unchanged? >> > > I also have this question. The glance API is one of the most fundamental > and basic APIs. You pretty much can't do anything useful on a cloud without > touching it. > > That said - it's not like glare couldn't also do those things - but I'd > need to understand some real specifics about what a cloud switching from > glance to glare looks like to the end user. > > Also, we have a new upload API designed for glance that took a LARGE > amount of wrangling to get consensus on. I'd also want to know what this > situation looks like in glare, if image upload in glare supports all of the > use-cases that we figured out image upload in glance needed to support. AND > - there are folks who want import-from which was removed between glance v1 > and v2. Does glare support something in this area? I think you ask about "copy-from". Then yes, it's planned to implement this week. > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
