On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:30:49PM +0000, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-07-26 12:56:55 +0200 (+0200), Niels de Vos wrote: > [...] > > My current guess is that adding a 3rd party CI [3] for Gluster is > > the only missing piece? > [...] > > I thought GlusterFS was free/libre software. If so, won't the Cinder > team allow upstream testing in OpenStack's CI system for free > backends/drivers? Maintaining a third-party CI system for that seems > like overkill, but I'm unfamiliar with Cinder's particular driver > testing policies. > -- > Jeremy Stanley
You are correct Jeremy. It wasn't a CI issue that caused the removal. IIRC, Red Hat decided to focus on Ceph as the platform for Cinder storage. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev