Hi Dims. Thanks, done. Hi Tim,
Thanks for the question. In OpenStack HA community, we discussed about converged upstream solution for 3 cycles now [1][2]. Adam Spiers and I present our findings and proposal in Boston summit [3]. Comparison with other F/OSS solutions are in [4] and, as the HA community we presented our unified architecture. Our unified solution for compute node failure scenario is in [5], where Masakari is a key component of the architecture. For other failure scenarios such as, process failure or instance failure, only Masakari can recover instances. From all the discussions I had with community members so far, I think Masakari is the right solution to address VMs HA. Or otherwise, anyone is welcome to raise their concerns now. I will be happy to discuss them. [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-instance-ha [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/openstack-resource-agents-specs [3] https://www.openstack.org/videos/boston-2017/high-availability-for-instances-moving-to-a-converged-upstream-solution [4] https://aspiers.github.io/openstack-summit-2017-boston-compute-ha/#/comparison [5] https://aspiers.github.io/openstack-summit-2017-boston-compute-ha/#/grand-unified-architecture --- Regards, Sampath On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Tim Bell <[email protected]> wrote: > Great to see efforts for this use case. > > Is there community convergence that Masakari is the solution to address VMs > high availability? > > Tim > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sam P <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, 1 September 2017 at 19:27 > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <[email protected]> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [tc][masakari] new project teams application for > Masakari > > Hi All, > > I have just proposed inclusion of Masakari[1] (Instances High Availability > Service) into list of official OpenStack projects in [2]. Regarding this > proposal, I would like to ask OpenStack community for what else can be > improved > in the project to meet all the necessary requirements. > > And I would like use this thread to extend the discussion about project > masakari. It would be great if you can post your comments/questions in > [2] or in > this thread. I would be happy to discuss and answer to your questions. > > I will be at PTG in Denver from 9/12 (Tuesday) to 9/14(Thursday). Other > Masakari > team members also will be there at PTG. We are happy to discuss anything > regarding to Masakari in PTG. > Please contact us via freenode IRC @ #openstack-masakari, or > openstack-dev ML > with prefix [masakari]. > > Thank you. > > [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Masakari > [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/500118/ > > --- Regards, > Sampath > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
