On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:15 AM, Emil Enemærke <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have stated using the puppet-ceph module for deploying ceph, and have > noticed a heavy use of exec in fx define 'ceph::osd' > (https://github.com/openstack/puppet-ceph/blob/master/manifests/osd.pp). Is > there a reason for not writing this define as an ensurable type/provider? > Otherwise I will fork the module an start on rewriting it for a > type/provider. >
Thanks for helping out. I'm happy to see folks using the puppet-ceph modules! I think the reason why we've relied of the Exec's is purely historic. If you have a patch that would convert it to an ensurable type and provider, we'd be more than happy to merge it! > > Cheers > Emil > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
