On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 15:06 +0000, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-09-06 10:40:14 +0100 (+0100), Stephen Finucane wrote: > [...] > > OK, and we do want to use a FQDN as the hostnames inside the > > guest? That's my key question. Random ServerFault questions seems > > to suggest no clear answer to this [1]. > > [...] > > As a data point, the servers maintained by the Infra team are > consistently built with their FQDN as the instance name itself, and > then the hostname and domainname set from that value in order to > avoid the dreaded "foo.novalocal" sorts of FQDNs prevalent in so > many OpenStack environments. At least for us, having OpenStack > specify the domain is more of a nuisance to be worked around than > anything.
That's great feedback. > You may also want to consider asking a similar question on the > operators ML, or perhaps sending them a pointer to this discussion > so you can get more real-world feedback. Good call. I'll re-post this to the operators mailing list (with the above point) and see what feedback I receive. Cheers, Stephen __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev