I don't think there ever was a technical limitation to add support for it. I have nothing to back my claims but IIRC, it was more philosophical points against adding support for it.
-- Mathieu On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Chris Friesen <chris.frie...@windriver.com> wrote: > On 10/06/2017 11:32 AM, Mathieu Gagné wrote: >> >> Why not supporting this use case? > > > I don't think anyone is suggesting we support do it, but nobody has stepped > up to actually merge a change that implements it. > > I think what Matt is suggesting is that we make it fail fast *now*, and if > someone else implements it then they can remove the fast failure at the same > time. > > Chris > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev