On Oct 6, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Chris Dent <cdent...@anticdent.org> wrote:
> The extent to which an > allocation request is not always opaque and the need to be explicit > about microversions was clarified, so edleafe is going to make some > adjustments, after first resolving the prerequisite code (alternate > hosts: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/486215/ ). For the record, what was clarified was that the agreement that the allocation_request blob that had been previously agreed to as an opaque blob had been compromised by some last-minute hacks to get migrations working before the Pike deadline. As a result of this change, it was now necessary to add versioning to these allocation_request objects, because now Nova or any other service could be altering them as they saw fit. I still think that this is a terrible design, but I will bow to the pressure to go along with accommodating the change to the previous design. -- Ed Leafe
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
