Sounds interesting! I'd be *very* interested to see *any* work that's been done to make use of SPDK functionality for faster or more efficient HTTP -> rotational media storage. Couple of thoughts...
1) I think the memcache or redis API would be a better target for SPDK research than Swift's HTTP blobstore API - if you're just going for a pure generic kv interface to a abstract/SSD/NVMe/XPoint storage backend [1] 2) if you wanna see how you might store Swift objects in a generic k/v store you might consider earlier work to support k/v drives [2] Good luck, I'm excited to see how you might try to apply SPDK to OpenStack Swift! Say Hi to Paul! -Clay 1. the account/container layer of the Swift API in particular leverages a lot of query like functionality and i'm not aware of any successful attempt at API parity on a pure k/v store abstraction. 2. https://github.com/swiftstack/kinetic-swift On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 9:18 PM, We We <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, all > > I am a newcomer in Swift, I have proposed a proposal for k-v store in the > SPDK community. The proposal has submitted on > https://trello.com/b/P5xBO7UR/things-to-do, please spare some time to > visit it. In this proposal, we would like to uses Swift as a target system > to support k-v store. Could you please share with me if you have any ideas > about it. I'd love to hear from your professional thoughts. > > Thx， > > Helloway > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
