I just sent a calendar invite to everyone who responded to this thread or voted in the agenda. The session will be recorded if you are unable to make it.
Thanks! On 10/18/2017 10:10 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > Now that we have some good feedback on the doodle, it looks like we > have two sessions that will work for everyone. One is October 25th > from 15:00 - 16:00 UTC and the other is also the 25th from 16:00 - 17:00. > > Let's shoot to meet at *15:00 UTC* on *October 25th* and if the > meeting goes over, we have time allocated for that. Would anyone like > a formal calendar invite? If so, I can send one out. The etherpad [0] > will act as our "schedule", but we'll likely just work through the > cases we've documented. > > Thanks! > > [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/analyzing-other-policy-systems > > > On 10/16/2017 08:45 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote: >> Sending out a gentle reminder to vote for time slots that work for >> you [0]. We'll keep the poll open for a few more days, or until we >> reach quorum. Thanks! >> >> [0] https://beta.doodle.com/poll/ntkpzgmcv3k6v5qu >> >> On 10/11/2017 01:48 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: >>> Oh - one note about the doodle [0]. All proposed times are in UTC, >>> so just keep that in mind when selecting your availability. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> [0] https://beta.doodle.com/poll/ntkpzgmcv3k6v5qu >>> >>> On 10/11/2017 01:44 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: >>>> In today's policy meeting we went through and started prepping for >>>> the session. Relevant information has been captured in the etherpad >>>> [0]. >>>> >>>> We're going to hold the meeting using *Google* *Hangouts*. I'll >>>> update the etherpad with a link to the hangout once we settle on a >>>> date. If you plan on attending, please *vote* *for* *available* >>>> *times* [1]. I've proposed a bunch of time slots (4 each day for >>>> the next two weeks) to try and find a time that works for everyone. >>>> People from US, AU, and EU will be trying to attended, so we're not >>>> going to find a perfect time for everyone. Having said that, *we're >>>> going to record the session*. >>>> >>>> Most of what we talked about in the meeting today uncovered the >>>> need to go over the basics of AWS IAM. That should be something we >>>> can do with a free account, which I'm going to sign up for. If we >>>> need more time we can have another session or look at options for >>>> upgrading the account. >>>> >>>> >>>> [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/analyzing-other-policy-systems >>>> [1] https://doodle.com/poll/ntkpzgmcv3k6v5qu >>>> >>>> On 10/09/2017 04:23 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: >>>>> I've put a scheduling session on the books for the next policy >>>>> meeting [0][1]. Advertising it here since folks who want to be >>>>> involved have responded to the thread. >>>>> >>>>> Let's use this meeting time to iron out account details and figure >>>>> out what exactly we want to get out of the session. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [0] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Keystone_Policy_Meeting >>>>> [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-policy-meeting >>>>> >>>>> On 10/05/2017 02:24 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Lance Bragstad >>>>>> <lbrags...@gmail.com <mailto:lbrags...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>> >>>>>> It was mentioned in today's keystone meeting [0] that it >>>>>> would be useful >>>>>> to go through AWS IAM (or even GKE) as a group. With all the >>>>>> recent >>>>>> policy discussions and work, it seems useful to get our eyes >>>>>> on another >>>>>> system. The idea would be to spend time using a video >>>>>> conference/screen >>>>>> share to go through and play with policy together. The end >>>>>> result should >>>>>> keep us focused on the implementations we're working on >>>>>> today, but also >>>>>> provide clarity for the long-term vision of OpenStack's RBAC >>>>>> system. >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you interested in attending? If so, please respond to the >>>>>> thread. >>>>>> Once we have some interest, we can gauge when to hold the >>>>>> meeting, which >>>>>> tools we can use, and setting up a test IAM account. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Lance >>>>>> >>>>>> [0] >>>>>> >>>>>> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2017/keystone.2017-10-03-18.00.log.html#l-119 >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2017/keystone.2017-10-03-18.00.log.html#l-119> >>>>>> >>>>>> Please count me in. >>>>>> >>>>>> Colleen >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>>>> Unsubscribe: >>>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev