On 2017-10-25 12:18:59 -0400 (-0400), Zane Bitter wrote: [...] > Can we maybe calculate the electorate size using the old method as well so > that we can quantify how much of the dropoff (in theory it could be more > than 100%) was due to the change in effective eligibility criteria vs. > organic change in the number of contributors? [...]
I did a baseline comparison of the old and new methods as they were developed, and as of a few days before the most recent PTL elections the percentage of "old" TC electorate who lacked discoverable foundation member profiles (either because of no matching E-mail addresses or lapsed membership due to a failure to vote in board elections) was right at 10%. It's likely to have diverged a little since that time (my guess is that it won't have moved much), but the election officials _should_ be able to produce this number trivially since the structured data output by the validation script includes all contributors and merely flags the "member" contributors eligible to vote by including their discovered OpenStack Foundation Individual Member Id numbers. -- Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev