On 11/07/2017 11:47 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> I'd like to propose we remove the upgrade jobs that are consistently failing >> from the upstream infrastructure and instead focus our efforts in RDO >> Software Factory. >> >> The jobs listed in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/518405/ are consistently >> failing after being reviewed by myself and Mathieu. I am leaving >> legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-multinode-upgrades in place as it's passing with >> an overall rate of 87%. >> >> It doesn't make any sense to continue to tax upstream resources on failing >> jobs, lets get the jobs running correctly and consistently in rdo software >> factory before moving these back to our mainline CI. >> >> Please let me know what you think of the proposal. > +1 to remove them if we have the scenario upgrades (with parity from > what we had upstream) in RDO CI. > We'll need to make the job experimental in RDO CI, so we can only run > them at demand until they actually work. Can we do that as well? > > Thanks,
+1, I missed this thread due to no subject ;) Thank you Wes for having moved those jobs in SF and for raising this thread. Mathieu __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
