Hi On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Rochelle Grober < [email protected]> wrote:
> First off, let me say I think this is a tremendous idea. And, it's > perfect for the SIG concept. > > Next, see inline: > > Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > > [...] > > > during the last summit in Sydney we discussed the possibility of > > > creating an OpenStack quality assurance special interest group > (OpenStack > > QA SIG). > > > The proposal was discussed during the QA feedback session [0] and it > > > received positive feedback there; I would like to bring now the > > > proposal to a larger audience via the SIG, dev and operators mailing > > > lists. > > > [...] > > > > I think this goes with the current trends of re-centering upstream > "project > > teams" on the production of software, while using SIGs as communities of > > practice (beyond the governance boundaries), even if they happen to > > produce (some) software as the result of their work. > > > > One question I have is whether we'd need to keep the "QA" project team at > > all. Personally I think it would create confusion to keep it around, for > no gain. > > SIGs code contributors get voting rights for the TC anyway, and SIGs are > free > > to ask for space at the PTG... so there is really no reason (imho) to > keep a > > "QA" project team in parallel to the SIG ? > > Well, you can get rid of the "QA Project Team" but you would then need to > replace it with something like the Tempest Project, or perhaps the Test > Project. You still need a PTL and cores to write, review and merge tempest > fixes and upgrades, along with some of the tests. The Interop Guideline > tests are part of Tempest because being there provides oversight on the > style and quality of the code of those tests. We still need that. > > --Rocky > > > In the same vein we are looking into turning the Security project team > into a > > SIG, and could consider turning other non-purely-upstream teams (like > I18n) > > in the future. > > > > -- > > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > openstack-sigs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
