That adds more latency, I believe some vendor plugins do it like that (service VM).
Have you checked out networking-ovn?, it's all done in openflow, and you have Ha (A/P) for free without extra namespaces, just flows and bfd monitoring. On Dec 4, 2017 4:22 PM, "Jaze Lee" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > Can we put router into virtual machine rather than in namespace? Then > the HA, and devops will be more elegant. You can live mirage, and use > haproxy. > The namespace can not be live mirage. It is bind to the host and lose > flexible. > Or is there some talks or specs about this? > > -- > 谦谦君子 > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
