Chris Dent <[email protected]> writes:

> The expansion of the Foundation was talked about at the summit in
> Sydney, but having something happen this quickly was a bit of a
> surprise, leading to some [questions in
> IRC](http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2017-12-05.log.html#t2017-12-05T14:11:33)
> today. Jonathan Bryce showed up to help answer them.

I'd like to address a misconception in that IRC log:

2017-12-05T14:20:56  <dhellmann> it does not take long to create a repo on our 
infrastructure
2017-12-05T14:21:14  <dhellmann> though I guess without the name flattening, it 
would have been an "openstack" repository

While there's still some work to be done on flattening the namespace for
existing repos, I think it would be quite straightforward to create a
repository for a non-openstack project in gerrit with no prefix (or, of
course, a different prefix).  I don't think that would have been an
obstacle.

And regarding this:

2017-12-05T15:05:30  <cmurphy> i'm not sure how much of infra's ci they could 
make use of given https://github.com/kata-containers/tests

I don't see an obstacle to using Zuul right now either -- even before
they have tests.

-Jim

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to