OK thanks for the info, I’ll have a look into these and add some bugs/patches.
Cheers, Sam On 11 Dec 2013, at 10:21 am, Chris Behrens <cbehr...@codestud.com> wrote: > On Dec 9, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Sam Morrison <sorri...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I’m trying to fix up some cells issues related to objects. Do all compute >> api methods take objects now? >> cells is still sending DB objects for most methods (except start and stop) >> and I know there are more than that. >> >> Eg. I know lock/unlock, shelve/unshelve take objects, I assume there are >> others if not all methods now? > > I don't think all of them do. As the compute API methods were changing, we > were changing the cells code at the same time to not use the generic > 'call_compute_api_method' RPC call. > > It's possible some got missed, however. And in fact, it does look like this > is the case. The shelve calls appear to be example of where things were > converted, but the cells code was forgotten. :-/ > > We'll want to implement new RPC calls in nova/cells/rpcapi that are > compatible with the compute_rpcapi calls that are normally used. And then > add the appropriate code in nova/cells/manager.py and nova/cells/messaging.py. > > I can help fix this all up. I guess we'll want to find and file bugs for all > of these. It appears you've got a bug filed for unlock… (lock would also be > broken, I would think). > > - Chris > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
