Huge +1, I didn't realize this was in docs now. We can finally stop doing it manually \o/
// jim On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 7:45 AM, John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com> wrote: > Hi, > > While I was looking at the traits work, I noticed we still have policy and > config in tree for ironic and ironic inspector: > > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic/tree/etc/ > ironic/policy.json.sample > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic/tree/etc/ > ironic/ironic.conf.sample > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic/tree/etc/ironic/policy.json > > And in a similar way: > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic-inspector/ > tree/policy.yaml.sample > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic-inspector/tree/example.conf > > There is an argument that says we shouldn't force operators to build a > full environment to generate these, but this has been somewhat superseded > by us having good docs: > > https://docs.openstack.org/ironic/latest/configuration/sample-config.html > https://docs.openstack.org/ironic/latest/configuration/sample-policy.html > https://docs.openstack.org/ironic-inspector/latest/ > configuration/sample-config.html > https://docs.openstack.org/ironic-inspector/latest/ > configuration/sample-policy.html > > It could look something like this (but with the tests working...): > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536349 > > What do you all think? > > Thanks, > johnthetubaguy > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev