Yes, that seems like a reasonable approach. +1

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Liam Young <liam.yo...@canonical.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose that we do not support the notifications
> method for automatically creating DNS records in Queens+. This method
> for achieving Neutron integration has been superseded both upstream
> and in the charms. By removing support for it in Queens we prevent the
> charm from attempting to make designate v1 api calls for Queens+ which
> is a positive thing given it will have been removed (
> https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/designate/queens.
> html#critical-issues
> ).
>
> Thanks
> Liam
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Alex Kavanagh - Software Engineer
Cloud Dev Ops - Solutions & Product Engineering - Canonical Ltd
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to