On 18-02-14 13:55:53, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:09:47AM -0600, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > Development has stalled, (since 2014).  It's been forked but now would
> > be a good time to move to a more actively maintained crypto library like
> > cryptography.
> > 
> > Requirements wishes to drop pycrypto.  Let me know if there's anything
> > we can do to facilitate this.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
> We did have a discussion on the ML, and I think a little at one of the PTGs,
> about the path forward for this. IIRC, there was one other potential supported
> package that was considered for an option, but we settled on cryptography as
> the recommended path forward to get off of pycrypto. I think it had to do with
> ease of being able to just drop in the new package with minimal affected code.

Yep, I remember it, I'm not mentioning it because I'd like to focus on
moving to cryptography rather than move to the fork.

Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Reply via email to