Perhaps we need to consider a backport of the syntax to the 2.5 series? It could help with the transition for those who need to upgrade. However, on the other hand it might make deployers more complacent to do so.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:03 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2018-02-18 19:25:07 -0800 (-0800), Emilien Macchi wrote: > [...] > > My recommendation for TripleO devs: use the old syntax if you want your > > code to be tested by RDO Third party CI > [...] > > This is hopefully only a temporary measure? I think I've heard it > mentioned that planning is underway to switch that CI system to Zuul > v3 (perhaps after 3.0.0 officially releases soon). > -- > Jeremy Stanley > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev