On 1 February 2018 at 16:18, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> o Should I create a new tempest test for baremetal as some of the
>>>> networking stuff is different?
>>> I think we would need to run baremetal tests for this new featureset,
>>> see existing files for examples.
>> Do you mean that we should use existing tests somewhere or create new
> I mean we should use existing tempest tests from ironic, etc. Maybe just a
> baremetal scenario that spawn a baremetal server and test ssh into it, like
> we already have with other jobs.
Done, the current set of patches sets up a new non voting job
"tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario011-multinode-oooq-container" which setup up
ironic in the overcloud and run the ironic tempest job
its currently passing so I'd appreciate a few eyes on it before it becomes
out of date again
there are 4 patches starting here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/509728/19
> o Is running a script on the controller with NodeExtraConfigPost the best
>>>> way to set this up or should I be doing something with quickstart? I don't
>>>> think quickstart currently runs things on the controler does it?
>>> What kind of thing do you want to run exactly?
>> The contents to this file will give you an idea, somewhere I need to
>> setup a node that ironic will control with ipmi
> extraconfig works for me in that case, I guess. Since we don't productize
> this code and it's for CI only, it can live here imho.
> Emilien Macchi
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)