On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:39:14AM -0700, Dan Smith wrote: > > Can you be more specific about what is limiting you when you use > > volume-backed instances? > > Presumably it's because you're taking a trip over iscsi instead of using > the native attachment mechanism for the technology that you're using? If > so, that's a valid argument, but it's hard to see the tradeoff working > in favor of adding all these drivers to nova as well. > > If cinder doesn't support backend-specific connectors, maybe that's > something we could work on? People keep saying that "cinder is where I > put my storage, that's how I want to back my instances" when it comes to > justifying BFV, and that argument is starting to resonate with me more > and more.
Um, that's what we have os-brick for, isn't it? And yes, we also have an os-brick connector for the "STORPOOL" connection type that is also part of the Queens release. Best regards, Peter __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
