I think it's a good idea especially as some times a spec is never completed or not in the same release.
Thanks, Amy(spotz) On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> wrote: > Ironic (and surely other projects) have had to point out many times that > specs are a point in time design discussion, and not completed > documentation. It's obviously too much work to go back and update specs > constantly. > > What do folks think about a banner at the top of the specs website (or > each individual spec) that points this out? I'm happy to do the work if we > agree it's a good thing to do. My suggested wording: > > "NOTE: specifications are a point-in-time design reference, not up-to-date > feature documentation." > > // jim > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
