On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 12:52 +1030, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Jay Pipes <[email protected]> wrote: <snip> > > +1. I agree with most of what Mike says above. The idea that > there are core "extensions" in Nova's v3 API doesn't make a > whole lot of sense to me. > > So would it help if we used the term "plugin" to talk about the > framework that the API is implemented with, > and extensions when talking about things which extend the core API? So > the whole of the API is implemented > using plugins, while the core plugins are not considered to be > extensions.
Yeah, that makes more sense :) Best, -jay _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
