Excerpts from Renat Akhmerov's message of 2018-03-29 15:33:58 +0700:
> After some discussion in IRC on this topic there was an idea just to write 
> and push upstream needed tools using objgraph w/o having it in the 
> requirements.txt at all. We just need to make sure that those tools are never 
> used during production runs and unit tests (CI will help to verify that). If 
> needed, objgraph can be manually installed used when we need to investigate 
> something.
> 
> If such practice is considered OK and doesn’t violate any OpenStack 
> guidelines then I think this would work, at least in my case.

I don't see any problem with that but I'm also not necessarily opposed
to adding it to the global requirements list so we can use it like other
dependencies.

What sorts of tools are you talking about building?

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Renat Akhmerov
> @Nokia
> 
> On 29 Mar 2018, 15:00 +0700, Renat Akhmerov <[email protected]>, wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can we consider to add objgraph [1] to OpenStack global requirements? I 
> > found this library extremely useful for investigating memory leaks in 
> > Python programs but unfortunately I can’t push upstream any code using it. 
> > It seems to be pretty mature and supports all needed Python versions.
> >
> > Or maybe there’s some alternative already available in the OpenStack 
> > requirements?
> >
> > [1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/objgraph/3.4.0
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Renat Akhmerov
> > @Nokia

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to