On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com>

> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
>> Here's the current status.  I'd like to ask the projects what's keeping
>> them from removing pycrypto in facor of a maintained library.
>> pyghmi:
>>   - (merge conflict) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/331828
>>   - (merge conflict) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/545465
>>   - (doesn't change the import) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/545182
> Looks like py26 support might be a blocker here. While we've brought
> pyghmi into the ironic project, it's still a project mostly built and
> maintained
> by Jarrod, and he has customers outside of OpenStack that depend on it.
> The ironic team will have to discuss this with Jarrod and find a good path
> forward.
> My initial thought is that we need to move forward on this, so
> perhaps we can release this change as a major version, and keep a py26
> branch that can be released on the previous minor version for the people
> that need this on 2.6. Thoughts?

I reached out to Jarrod off-list and sounds like this is roughly the plan:

> FWIW, I did at least merge a change to work with cryptodomex and moved
pyghmi to that when available (I could not discern a way to have
requirements allow one of multiple choices).
> I thought about cryptodome, but that breaks paramiko in that environment.
> I’ll probably do a 1.1.0 that uses cryptography, and continue 1.0 with

// jim
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Reply via email to