That's very cool. Any idea of the repartition of nodes xenial vs bionic? Is that a very restricted amount of nodes?
On 20 April 2018 at 00:37, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > Greetings, > > With ubuntu-bionic release around the corner we'll be starting discussions > about > migrating jobs from ubuntu-xenial to ubuntu-bionic. > > On topic I'd like to raise, is round job migrations from legacy to native > zuulv3. Specifically, I'd like to propose we do not add legacy-ubuntu-bionic > nodesets into openstack-zuul-jobs. Projects should be working towards moving > away from the legacy format, as they were just copypasta from our previous JJB > templates. > > Projects would still be free to move them intree, but I would highly encourage > projects do not do this, as it only delays the issue. > > The good news is the majority of jobs have already been moved to native zuulv3 > jobs, but there are still some projects still depending on the legacy > nodesets. > For example, tox bases jobs would not be affected. It mostly would be dsvm > based jobs that haven't been switch to use the new devstack jobs for zuulv3. > > -Paul > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
