Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2018-05-18 00:03:35 +0000: > On 2018-05-17 18:47:06 -0500 (-0500), Matt Riedemann wrote: > > On 5/17/2018 5:23 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > Not to troll too hard here, but it's kind of frustrating to see that > > > twitter trumps people actually proposing sessions on time and then > > > having them be rejected. > > > > I reckon this is because there were already a pre-defined set of slots / > > rooms for Forum sessions and we had fewer sessions proposed than reserved > > slots, and that's why adding something in later is not a major issue? > > Yes, as I understand it we still have some overflow space too if > planned forum sessions need continuing. Session leaders have > hopefully received details from the event planners on how to reserve > additional space in such situations. As far as I'm aware no proposed > Forum sessions were rejected this time around, and there was some > discussion among members of the TC (in #openstack-tc[*]) before it > was agreed there was room to squeeze this particular latecomer into > the lineup. > > [*] > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2018-05-14.log.html#t2018-05-14T17:27:05
Yes, that's right. I do remember that we've had sessions rejected in the past (for space considerations or to avoid overbalancing the schedule with too many sessions on a given topic), but it feels like it has been quite a while since that happened. Maybe I'm wrong? Has that been a persistent problem? Doug __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev