On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 07:39:14PM +0100, Ian Wells wrote: > 1. The patch ties Neutron's parameters specifically to dnsmasq. It would > be, I think, impossible to reimplement this for isc-dhcpd, for instance.
While I agree in theory with this point - there are currently no active blueprints to add another DHCP server to Neutron. The isc-dhcp one has been stalled for quite a long time. Frankly, if we can think of better names for the modes that we're looking to have happen for v6 provisioning, that doesn't rely directly on dnsmasq-isms, I'm all ears. Feel free to propose better names for the modes and we'll create a map between the modes and what you pass to dnsmasq. -- Sean M. Collins _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
