After reading the spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/554717/14/doc/specs/rocky/cyborg-nova-sched.rst , I confuse on the CUSTOM_ACCELERATOR_FPGA meaning. Initially, I thought it means a region. But after reading the spec, it can be a device, a region or a function. Is it on purpose design?
Sounds like we need to have agreement on the naming also. We already have resource class `VGPU`, so we only need to add another resource class 'FPGA'(but same as above question, I thought it should be FPGA_REGION?), is it right? I didn't see any requirement on the prefix 'ACCELERATOR'. 2018-05-31 4:18 GMT+08:00 Eric Fried <openst...@fried.cc>: > This all sounds fully reasonable to me. One thing, though... > > >> * There is a resource class per device category e.g. > >> CUSTOM_ACCELERATOR_GPU, CUSTOM_ACCELERATOR_FPGA. > > Let's propose standard resource classes for these ASAP. > > https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/d741f624c81baf89fc8b6b94a2bc20 > eb5355a818/nova/rc_fields.py > > -efried > . > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev