Cool.
I'll start to prepare a BP for this, so we can have more detailed
discussion.

On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:08 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon <celeb...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Irena Berezovsky <irenab....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Sounds like a great initiative.
> >
> > Lets follow up on the proposal by the kuryr-kubernetes blueprint.
>
> I fully subscribe what Irena said. Let's get on this quick!
>
> >
> > BR,
> > Irena
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 6:47 AM, Peng Liu <p...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Kuryr-kubernetes team,
> >>
> >> I'm thinking to propose a new BP to support  Kubernetes Network Custom
> >> Resource Definition De-facto Standard Version 1 [1], which was drafted
> by
> >> network plumbing working group of kubernetes-sig-network. I'll call it
> NPWG
> >> spec below.
> >>
> >> The purpose of NPWG spec is trying to standardize the multi-network
> effort
> >> around K8S by defining a CRD object 'network' which can be consumed by
> >> various CNI plugins. I know there has already been a BP VIF-Handler And
> Vif
> >> Drivers Design, which has designed a set of mechanism to implement the
> >> multi-network functionality. However I think it is still worthwhile to
> >> support this widely accepted NPWG spec.
> >>
> >> My proposal is to implement a new vif_driver, which can interpret the
> PoD
> >> annotation and CRD defined by NPWG spec, and attach pod to additional
> >> neutron subnet and port accordingly. This new driver should be mutually
> >> exclusive with the sriov and additional_subnets drivers.So the endusers
> can
> >> choose either way of using mult-network with kuryr-kubernetes.
> >>
> >> Please let me know your thought, any comments are welcome.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ny03h6IDVy_e_vmElOqR7UdTPAG_
> RNydhVE1Kx54kFQ/edit#heading=h.hylsbqoj5fxd
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> --
> >> Peng Liu
> >>
> >> ____________________________________________________________
> ______________
> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:
> unsubscribe
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> ______________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:
> unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Peng Liu
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to