On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:46 AM, Doug Hellmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2018-06-12 09:28:48 -0500: > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Emilien Macchi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > While I agree with Doug that we assume good faith and hope for the > best, I > > > personally think we should help them (what we're doing now) but also > make > > > sure we DO NOT set a precedent. We could probably learn from this > situation > > > and document in our governance what the TC expects when companies have > a > > > fork and need to contribute back at some point. We all know StarlingX > isn't > > > alone and I'm pretty sure there are a lot of deployments out there who > are > > > in the same situation. > > > > /me pus on ex-TC hat for a minute > > > > Emilien, I totally agree with you here but would word it differently: > > we should absolutely set a precedent, but one that exhibits how we > > want to handle what ttx calls 'convergent' forks. These already > > exist, like it or not. What I hope can be established is some > > guidelines and boundaries on how to deal with these rather than just > > reject them out-of-hand. > > Yes, well said. Indeed, thanks Dean. -- Emilien Macchi
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
