Hi, Ian: I won’t say the intent here is to replace dnsmasq-mode-keyword BP. Instead, I was trying to leverage and enhance those definitions so when dnsmasq is launched, it knows which mode it should run in.
That being said, I see the value of your points and I also had lengthy discussion with Randy regarding this. We did realize that the keyword itself may not be sufficient to properly configure dnsmasq. Let us discuss that on Thursday’s IRC meeting. Randy and I had a quick glance over your document. Much of it parallels the work we did on our POC last summer, and is now being addressed across multiple BP being implemented by ourselves or with Sean Collins and IBM team's work. I will take a closer look and provide my comments. Thank you for sharing! Shixiong On Dec 18, 2013, at 6:30 AM, Ian Wells <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Shixiong, > > This is intended as a replacement for [1], correct? Do you have code for > this already, or should we work with Sean's patch? > > There's a discussion document at [2], which is intended to be more specific > behind the reasoning for the choices we make, and the interface offered to > the user for these features. I'd be grateful if you could read and comment > on it. > -- > Ian. > > [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/dnsmasq-mode-keyword > [2] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rOBOOu_OwixMStm6XJOb5PKkJA6eFbL_XCE7wlTfaPY > > > > On 18 December 2013 04:19, Randy Tuttle <[email protected]> wrote: > Great Shixiong. I can see that we have BPs from Sean / Da Zhao for providing > the modes via the neutron client cli, but have we seen how those modes are > provided through the dashboard? > > Randy > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 17, 2013, at 9:07 PM, Shixiong Shang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, team: > > > > I created a new blueprint to reflect the work we accomplished in the > > previous POC to enable dnsmasq in SLAAC mode. In addition, I took the > > action item two weeks ago from weekly sub-team meeting to explore DHCPv6 > > options. The goal was to run dnsmasq as DHCPv6 server and provide both > > optional information and/or IPv6 address to VM in the tenant network. Below > > you can find the link to the new blueprints, which are all related to the > > mid-term goal in Sean’s original proposal. > > > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/dnsmasq-ipv6-slaac > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/dnsmasq-ipv6-dhcpv6-stateful > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/dnsmasq-ipv6-dhcpv6-stateless > > > > Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! > > > > Shixiong > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
