On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 02:57:27PM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:40:21AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > >> I guess there are 3 options: > >> > >> 1. Require diversity for incubation, but find ways to bless or recommend > >> projects pre-incubation so that this diversity can actually be achieved > >> > >> 2. Do not require diversity for incubation, but require it for > >> graduation, and remove projects from incubation if they fail to attract > >> a diverse community > >> > >> 3. Do not require diversity at incubation time, but at least judge the > >> interest of other companies: are they signed up to join in the future ? > >> Be ready to drop the project from incubation if that was a fake support > >> and the project fails to attract a diverse community > > > > 2 and 3 don't look all that different to me. Are you saying that 3 > > does not have any 'diversity' requirement for graduation ? > > They are very similar. In (3) we'd require that several independent > parties have at least expressed interest in joining the project in the > future, while in (2) we'd completely ignore diversity as a criteria for > incubation and only evaluate it at graduation.
Ok, in that case I'd be fine with either 2 or 3. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev