Hello guys, I need to deploy the following Neutron BGPVPN heat plugin.
https://docs.openstack.org/networking-bgpvpn/ocata/heat.html This will allow users, to create Heat templates with BGPVPN resources. Right now, BGPVPN service plugin is only available in neutron-server-opendaylight Kolla image: https://github.com/openstack/kolla/blob/master/docker/neutron/neutron-server-opendaylight/Dockerfile.j2#L13 It would make sense to add right there the python-networking-bgpvpn-heat package. Is that correct? Heat exposes a parameter to configure plugins ( HeatEnginePluginDirs), that corresponds to plugins_dir parameter in heat.conf. What is the issue here? Heat will try to search any available plugin in the path determined by HeatEnginePluginDirs, however, the heat plugin is located in a separate container (neutron_api). How should we tackle this? I see no other example of this type of integration. AFAIK, /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages is not exposed to the host as a mounted volume, so how is heat supposed to find bgpvpn heat plugin? Thanks for your advice. Cheers -- Ricardo Noriega Senior Software Engineer - NFV Partner Engineer | Office of Technology | Red Hat irc: rnoriega @freenode
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
